Phone: (310) 550-6200
COVID-19
Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin, APLC Tax Attorney Los Angeles
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Tax Services
    • Foreign Bank Accounts and Offshore Tax Compliance
    • Tax Litigation
    • Tax Audit Representation
    • Tax Fraud and Tax Crimes
    • Tax Collection Defense
      • Offer in Compromise
      • Tax Levies
      • Tax Liens
      • Bankruptcy & Taxes
      • Innocent Spouse Relief
      • Trust Fund Recovery Penalties
    • Employment Taxes
    • Unfiled Tax Returns
    • Other Tax Services
  • COVID-19
  • Tax Attorneys
    • Gary M. Slavett
    • David C. Holtz
    • Igor S. Drabkin
    • Scott Burkholder
    • Leslie van der Wal
    • Michele F.L. Weiss
    • David J. Warner
  • Blog and News
    • COVID-19
    • Firm News
    • Internal Revenue Service
      • Audit
      • Criminal Tax
      • Employment Tax
      • Exempt Organizations
      • FBAR
      • Innocent Spouse Relief
      • Offshore Income
      • Trust Fund Recovery Penalty
    • California Employment Development Department
    • Franchise Tax Board
    • Sales Tax
    • Whistleblower Award
  • Contact
    • Beverly Hills Office
    • Los Angeles Office
    • Orange County Office
Select Page

Tax Court Rules for Taxpayer on Statute of Limitations Issue Related to Foreign Assets Reporting

by Igor Drabkin | Jan 8, 2018 | FBAR, Internal Revenue Service, Offshore Income, Tax Litigation

gavel on 1040 form

In Rafizadeh v. Commissioner, 150 T.C. No. 1, the Tax Court issued an important decision for the taxpayers, holding that the six-year statute of limitations with respect to income attributable to certain “specified foreign financial assets”, is effective only for those tax years to which the reporting requirement was applicable and in effect on March 18, 2010, when the statute of limitations was expanded by the HIRE Act.

In Rafizadeh, the taxpayer timely filed his federal income tax returns for tax years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, but failed to report income earned on a foreign account that he held. The IRS obtained information about that foreign account through a “John Doe” summons, which was resolved in November 2010. The IRS issued a notice of deficiency to the taxpayer on December 8, 2014, determining tax deficiencies and accuracy-related penalties for 2006-2009.  The IRS agreed that the notice of deficiency was issued after the expiration of the general three-year statute of limitations period.

The Tax Court dealt with the interplay of two statutes amended by Congress in 2010, as part of the HIRE Act.  Section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii) provided that the IRS may assess tax within six years after a return is filed “if the taxpayer omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein and … such amount (I) is attributable to one or more assets with respect to which information is required to be reported under section 6038D … and (II) is in excess of $5,000”.  Section 6038D, as enacted by the HIRE Act, requires reporting of additional information relating to “specified foreign financial assets”.

The issue in the Rafizadeh case was whether the expanded sic-year statute of limitations apply to the tax years for which the reporting requirements of section 6038D did not apply, i.e. tax years for which the tax returns were due before March 18, 2010 (2006, 2007 and 2008).

The Tax Court concluded that the six-year limitations period under section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii) does not apply to the 2006, 2007 and 2008 tax years, because the statute of limitations is extended only to the omitted gross income attributable to “specified foreign financial assets” with respect to which the reporting requirements of section 6038D were applicable and in effect, therefore, giving an important victory to the taxpayer.

Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin
Former IRS Tax Attorneys
(310) 550-6200
315 S. Beverly Drive
Suite 515
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Categories

Recent Posts

  • David J. Warner to Speak at Estate and Succession Planning Group Regarding Strategies to Handle an IRS Audit
  • Michele F.L. Weiss presenting to the California Lawyers Association, Women in Tax Committee Regarding IRS Enforcement Efforts with Syndicated Conservation Easements and Cryptocurrency
  • Michele F.L. Weiss and David J. Warner Presenting to the Tax Section of San Fernando Valley Bar Association Regarding Strategies to Handle an IRS Audit
  • Four Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin Attorneys Named 2021 Super Lawyers
  • Three HSD Tax Attorneys Presenting on IRS 2021 Priorities to the Orange County Bar Association Tax Section
Internal Revenue Service > FBAR > Tax Court Rules for Taxpayer on Statute of Limitations Issue Related to Foreign Assets Reporting

Beverly Hills Main Office

315 S. Beverly Drive
Suite 515
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 550-6200
Fax: (310) 774-3904

Orange County Office

4695 MacArthur Court
Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: (949) 999-6606
Fax: (949) 544-0440

Los Angeles Office

15233 Ventura Blvd.
Suite 1170
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Phone: (310) 550-6200
Fax: (310) 774-3904

Recent Posts

  • David J. Warner to Speak at Estate and Succession Planning Group Regarding Strategies to Handle an IRS Audit
  • Michele F.L. Weiss presenting to the California Lawyers Association, Women in Tax Committee Regarding IRS Enforcement Efforts with Syndicated Conservation Easements and Cryptocurrency
  • Michele F.L. Weiss and David J. Warner Presenting to the Tax Section of San Fernando Valley Bar Association Regarding Strategies to Handle an IRS Audit
  • Four Holtz, Slavett & Drabkin Attorneys Named 2021 Super Lawyers
  • Three HSD Tax Attorneys Presenting on IRS 2021 Priorities to the Orange County Bar Association Tax Section
  • Pandemic Tax Payment Problems: What should I do if the IRS does not process my check for payment of the my taxes?
  • IRS’s New Micro-Captive Insurance Settlement Program Offers a Path to Resolution, But Is the Settlement Best for You?

    Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress